Tuesday, February 9, 2010

10 Subjects Avoided by Mainstream Pastors- Part 2

4. Satan's Children Have Names.
We first start to see the enmity which God placed between Satan's seed (offspring) and Adam's seed in Genesis 3:3, where both Abel and Cain brought offerings to God. Being a farmer, Cain brought of the fruits of the ground. However Abel, being a shepherd, brought before God the firstlings or the 'best of the flock' and also the 'fat thereof', meaning the "fattest ones too." Of course God was displeased with Cain's offering but Cain couldn't see any other way than to do what his father (satan) would do. But God's reasoning was straight forward when He said in vs. 7, "If thou doest well, shall thou not be accepted? And if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him." It is a widely known fact that there has been a people throughout the ages who have not done well unto the people of the nations that they have tried to make a home in. Furthermore, they have been expelled from just about every nation that they, as vagabond's have set up residency in. They are called by the name Khazarian Jews today but are in fact, the Kenites, the son's of Cain, and the Tares, all being the same. In the following verse, we find the first war ever fought over religion. Cain's beliefs compared to Abel's beliefs concerning how to please God. Verse 8 reads; "And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, that when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him." Now we also have the first murderer being Cain. This is enmity run amuck. Now, in order to help identify the offspring of satan, we must consider the curse which God placed on Cain following the murder of Abel. In Genesis 3:11-12 we read; "And now art thou cursed from the earth, which hath opened her mouth to receive thy brother' blood from thy hand. When thou tillest the ground, it will not henceforth yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth." The "strength" is put forth here for 'that which it produces' ie:, crops. Okay, what is this saying? It is saying that although Cain's occupation was farmer, regardless of the time spent sowing seed, the ground would not produce a crop for him. This does not mean that Cain would lose his knowledge of farming, simply that he and his offspring would never produce crops by their own brown thumbs. In addition, God also said Cain would be a fugitive and a vagabond. Lets take a look at these two words in the Hebrew.
Fugitive. Hebrew- Nuwa = To scatter, to move constantly, (up and down), sift, stagger (to and fro), wander.
Vagabond. Hebrew- Nuwd = taunt, scatter, make to move, pity, wander.
I need not tell you who these wandering people, who are a taunt to every nation that they are expelled to and scattered from are. God does it for me. The offspring of Cain.
Lets take this study to the New Testament to get a closer look at Cain's father. Turn with me to Matthew 13:24 where we find the parable of the sower. In this parable, God is giving us understanding of the seedlines as represented by plants in a farmers field. The man (Farmer) here is God.
vs. 24, "The kingdom of Heaven is likened unto a man who sowed good seed in his field."
The 'good seed' is a plant which produces a crop.
vs. 25, "But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat and went his way."
When the enemy knew the farmer wouldn't be in the field (night), the enemy (Who is the enemy of God?), sowed tares (weeds who taunt the growth of crops) in the field (the world). It is of interesting note that all prophecies concerning satan and his many nicknames are given in months or moons (lunar or night) and all prophecies concerning Christ are given in days (solar or light).
vs. 26, "But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also."
The Tares always mature before the wheat, choking out the plant from vital sunlight. The Tares hinder the good seed plants from reaching their full potential. One only has to look around to observe the darkness which they cast. Whether through corruption of education, politics, religion or economics, their choking shadow has reached it's peak growth in this, our once great nation.
vs. 27, "So the servants of the householder came and said unto him, 'Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? From whence then hath it tares?'
Everyone hears about how God created the world and it's peoples. But hardly do we hear that another (Satan) planted his own crop of people, through Cain his son, to supply the negative role for this age.
vs. 28, "He said unto them, 'An enemy hath done this.' The servants said unto him, 'Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up'?
Wouldn't it be natural to pull the weeds (Tares) if we wanted our crops to produce the greatest amount of harvest? Remember though, they are asking about the Farmer's (God's) will.
vs. 29, "But he said, 'Nay, lest while ye gather up the tares, you root up also the wheat with them'".
Clearly we are no longer talking about a farm field. What we are talking about is the difficulty in identifying the tares (Son's of Cain or Khazarian Jews) from the wheat (True Israel or Judahites) of this world. It takes a specialist to differentiate between weeds and crops as it also requires a specialist to identify the Khazars from the Judahites. Some will be capable of both. However, God instructs us here to leave them alone because He wants to handle them at the harvest.
vs. 30, "Let both grow together until the harvest: And in the time of the harvest I will say to the reapers (Angels), 'Gather ye together, first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn'".
Again, we are not talking about a farm here. Farmers have the knowledge to identify weeds and remove them. But here, it required super-natural beings (angels) to perform the task of removing the tares. This links the harvest to the second advent. It also blows the doors off the rapture theory as 'rapturist's' believe that the first one's taken in the field are the wheat-to heaven. Lets go back to vs. 24 and remember the subject of this parable. "The Kingdom of Heaven." This parable is de3scribing the final generation before Satan's return as anti-Christ.
Finally, to put the name on these tares once and for all, and to draw a parallel between who assembles for to do and carry out Satan's will, we must go to the Book of Revelation. In Revelation Chapter 2, starting with verse 1 we have a message from God Himself to all the main churches existing in the 'last days'. These messages were delivered to St. John as he was in prison on the Isle of Patmos. Of the seven churches that are listed, only two are in good standing with God and they have a common denominator. Let's begin with the addressing one of the two who are in good standing in the last days, the Church of Smyrna. In Chapter 2:9, "I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty (but thou art rich). And I know the blasphemy of them that say they are Jews, and are not but are the synangogue of Satan." In God's address to the Church of Philadelphia, He states in 3:7, "These things say He that is Holy, He that is True, He that hath The Key of David, He That openeth and no man shutteth, and He That shutteth and no man openeth"; vs. 8, "I know thy works; behold, I have set before thee an open door, and no man can shut it; for thou hast a little strength, and has kept my Word, and has not denied My name." vs. 9, "Behold I make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; Behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee."
Synagogue. Greek- Sunago = gather themselves together, lead into, resort, assemble.
This Synagogue is not a Jewish church. It is an assembly of like-minded peoples who are of Satan. (his offspring) Forever claiming to be Jews (a corrupt form of the name Judah) when in fact they are lying. They are not descendants of Judah, they are descendants of Cain, their father. If you call one on their transgressions, they will call you an anti-semite. But they are not Semetic. They are of their father who was of Eve and The Serpent. Cain was banished to the Land of Nod for slaying his brother Abel. There, Cain took wives of the 6th day creation and became known as Sargon the Magnificent. God's true churches (Smyrna & Philadelphia) will identify these Serpent's seed and be fully aware of their works concerning the end times. The end times are here. Look around at our government, the federal reserve, the treasury and even the Presidential puppet post. The Cabinet of our current President is littered with Wall Street economists and lobbyist's (bribers). Follow the money trail and you will find them counting it, and the havoc they created while compiling it. The Kenites are creating a stage where their father, The King of Lies will soon perform in his role as "instead of Christ" and the WHOLE WORLD will be deceived. True Judah is part of the dispersed and are 'lost', not knowing their heritage. Beware of those who claim to be "Jews". Don't root them out, that's God's job at the Harvest.
For all nof those who worry more about offending tares than offending God, who want to call me an Anti-Semite, I say this; Just as all evergreens are trees, not all trees are evergreens. Even so, Although all true Judahites are Semetic, not all Semites are Judahites. The term Semite refers to the descendants of Shem, one of Noah's sons. Since Noah was Adamaic and Adam means ruddy-complected (to show blood in the face), this defines a race of people, of which, I am a member. Suffice it to say, that since the Khazar Jews do not show blood in the face and neither do they blush for their consequences, they are not Adamic, Semetic or of Judah. This is exactly what God was trying to explain to you through His address to the churches. 'They' claim to be of Judah, but are lying when they say it. If they walked around claiming Satan as their father, then it would be easy to tie their works to their heritage and their reputation to their crimes.
Just because the Kenites are hiding behind the shadow of Judah, does not mean that we have to be in darkness concerning the truth about these 'taunting Tares.'

Monday, February 1, 2010

Ten Subjects Avoided by Mainstream Pastors- Part 1

Got Milk? At most churches in this nation that is all you really get. It's great for babes in Christ but not for soldiers in Christ. At some point, a church has to align itself with either the Evangelist's or the Pastor's. With the Evangelist's, a pure milk (salvation and baptism) diet is acceptable. With the Pastor's however, the meat has to be provided immediately following the milk. I've always wondered why an Evangelist would want a regular congregation. After all, it's their job to bring people to the Lord and on their way to understanding His Word and His plan. The fact that some hear the same message, week after week and never grow in God's Word to advance to a level where they themselves can begin planting seeds is representative of what they are being taught week, after redundant week. Then we have the so called 'Pastor's". Now don't get me wrong, there are some decent Pastor's out there who possess the Key of David, but not many. God says, "Lo, I come in the volume of the Book". (Hebrews 10:7) Cover to cover. Yet, most pastor's never get out of the Gospels. It is for this reason that I am going to list ten truths that are rarely taught, but are key to understanding the whole of God's written Word. You may want to ask yourself and your Pastor why God's request in Hebrews 10:7 is being ignored.

1. The Three World Ages

There are three earth ages corresponding with three heavenly ages. The first earth and corresponding heavenly age began "In the beginning", (Genesis 1:1) and ended after Satan's katabole or overthrow (sometime before Genesis 1:2). During this overthrow, Satan was able to convince one third of all the souls created by God to follow him and revolt against God. God, in His mercy and grace, decided that, instead of destroying all of His creation, that He would create a 2nd earth age (Genesis 1:2) in which all souls would be born through woman, in the flesh, to choose, with free will, salvation through Christ or love the world which belongs to Satan. (Luke 11:23) Read II Peter chapter 3 for a complete description of the earth "that then was." Read Ezekiel Chapter 28 for a description of Satan before, during and after his fall.

2. Adam was 'formed' on the 8th Day of Creation

In Genesis 1:26, we have God creating man in the image or likeness of Himself and the angels (Elohim). He created the races (ethnic peoples) of the world ie;, the hunter and the fishermen. In chapter 2:1 we are told that God had finished creating the 2nd heaven and earth age and all the host of them. At this point, there is still no Adam & Eve. On the seventh day, God rested from the work of His creation and blessed that day and called it His Sabbath. In Genesis 2:5 we read that God had not caused it to rain because there was not a man to till the ground. For this purpose, God 'formed' the farmer that He needed from the very ground which, that farmer, (Adam) would sow and reap his crop. Since the seventh day had ended, it was on the eighth day in which Adam was 'formed' rather than created, as was the case with the sixth day man (ethnic peoples). The word man or Adam in verse 7 is Eth-Ha-adam = The Adam, The Man Adam, as a separate race, ruddy complected, to blush, flush or turn rosey. This is the Caucasion race.

3. Satan was the "serpent" in the Garden of Eden.

In Genesis 3:1, it states that "the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the the field." It doesn't say that he was a beast of the field, just that he was "wiser" than any other beast of the field. Subtil- Hebrew Arum= wise. We also know that this "serpent" is a man because he speaks to Eve. In Ezekiel 28:14-17 we find "that old serpent (from the garden) transformed into an angel of light." In Revelation 20:2 we read, "And he laid hold of the dragon, that old serpent, which is the devil, and Satan and bound him a thousand years." That "old serpent?" This connects the serpent of old, (in the garden) with the serpent or Satan of the great apostasy. In closing, in Ezekiel 28:17 we have this. "Thou (Satan) has been in Eden, in the Garden of God." The importance in this is that, we must recognize the seed lines in order to recognize who is in this world, de-facto, playing the negative role. It's the absolute answer for the questions-"who" has usurped our government and "why." You'll find the answers in the next paragraph.

4. Satan Has Children in This World.

Sounds far fetched? It shouldn't. Not if you've been taught the truth. Let's see if we can find some. Now that we have established that the serpent of the Garden of Eden was Satan, let's see what kind of "apple" Eve was tempted with. In Genesis 3:2 it reads, "And the woman said unto the serpent, we man eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden." This is Eve misquoting what God had said to them in 2:16 by not repeating the emphatic figure and thus omitting the word "freely." Chapter 3:3 reads, "But the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, 'Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.'" This sentence "Neither shall ye touch it", was added by Eve. See Genesis 2:16 & 17. The word "touch" in Hebrew is naga = to lay a hand on, to lie with a woman. In Genesis 3:6 we read, "And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired and to make one wise, she took the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also of her husband with her, and he did eat." Immediately following this beguiling, we see Adam and Eve covering their mouths with napkins to hide the apple juice. No, I jest. Fruit - Hebrew Paw-raw = To grow or increase Beguiled - Hebrew Nawshaw = To lead away mentally, to delude or seduce No, this was not an act of eating a forbidden apple. The two, Adam and Eve, sowed fig leaf aprons together to hide their nakedness, and their genitals. This was a sexual act, first between Eve and the serpent (Satan) and then Eve and Adam. This point is proven by the following points; 1. After this act was revealed, God makes this statement in Genesis 3:15 to the serpent, "And I will put enmity between thee and the woman and between thy seed and the woman's seed. It shall bruise thy head and thou shall bruise His heel." This should take you to Calvary. For it is there that Satan bruised our Lord's heel by piercing it unto the cross. Satan's bruising is yet to come. Lets look at a couple words from that last quote. Seed - Hebrew Zaw-raw = to sow, conceive seed, disseminate God's talking about impregnation here. He foresaw that Eve would the twins Cain and Abel by two separate fathers ie,; Satan and Adam Enmity- Hebrew ay-baw =Hostility, hatred The fact that Satan's child, Cain, slew his brother Abel, Adam's son, is proof of the enmity and the two separate fathers. Not to mention, that the act in the garden was an sexual act. 2. Again, immediately following the sexual act in the garden, God makes the following statement to Eve proving the nature of the sin was sexual. Genesis 3:16, "I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception. In sorrow, thou shalt bring forth children, and thy desire shall be unto thy husband, and he shall rule over thee." 3. If Cain was Adam's son, he would certainly be listed in Adam's geneaology. Instead, the genealogy is documented as this; 1) Adam, (2) Seth, (3) Enos, (4) Cainan, (5) Mahaleel, (6) Jared, (7) Enoch. Notice that Cain was never mentioned in the list of the Bible as a son of Adam; and Abel, of course, was never mentioned because he was murdered by Cain, and did not have any descendant. Note: To those who think that this is not possible, let it be known that the medical records are replete with cases where women have carried twins who were of separate ova and separate insemination with the fertilization of the eggs being days apart, and NOT ONLY SO, but some of the records show that the twins were fathered by separate males. Recently worldwide coverage was given to a Norwegian mother who was suing her husband for support for herself and her twins, one of which was white and the other black. She admitted that she had a Negro lover. The two conceptions were about three weeks apart. In Beaumont, Texas, in 1963, the records again set forth a multiple birth wherein pregnancies were many days apart, in fact so much so that the woman almost died along with one child in childbirth.